# A SEED DOESN’T END IN THE PACKET

## On a tomato’s pedigree, the memory of soil, the Moon, failed harvests, and humanity’s strange habit of losing the most interesting part the moment it enters a database

**MET[Ȧ]CADEMY OF HUMANITY (MoH)**  
**Research Essay · EN · v1.2 · 2026-09-13**  
**Ievgen Karogod / Dattara**

There is a strange thing modern civilization does to almost everything alive. First, it lives. Then we give it a number. Then the number becomes more important. A seed used to be a seed. It had a mother plant, some garden somewhere, a summer, a drought, a neighbour’s bee, the hands of the person who collected it, a jar on a shelf, and a story about how “Grandma Hanna used to grow this tomato.” Then the seed enters a catalogue. And suddenly what remains is: a name, a price, a country, a photograph, and a **BUY NOW** button. Congratulations. A living history several generations long has just been successfully converted into a product card.

For a shop, that may be enough. For life, it feels a little thin.

## Horses get pedigrees. Does the tomato just get “father unknown, case closed”?

Nobody is especially surprised when a horse has a pedigree. Here is the mother. Here is the father. Here is the line. Here is who produced whom, who won what, who had the temperament of an accountant after deadline week but excellent legs nevertheless. Dogs get the same treatment. With humans, we can spend half an evening arguing over who the great-grandfather was, where he lived, whom he loved, and why in 1937 he suddenly turned up three regions away from home. And a plant?

A plant often gets a label:

**Tomato Red Giant.**

Thank you. Biography complete. Except that it isn’t. A particular seed may have come from a particular plant. That plant grew in a particular place. There was heat. Or cold. Or rain every day in July. It may have been pollinated by another known plant, or by an unknown one, because the bee, regrettably, did not fill out the paperwork before takeoff. Then somebody chose that particular fruit. Then saved the seeds. Then gave them to someone else. Then that person moved from Ukraine to Poland, planted them there, selected the hardiest plant and, several generations later, ended up with a slightly different local line.

So where exactly, in this story, is the “product”? And where is the plant itself?

## A seed is more like a letter from the future

A seed is remarkable because it is past and future at the same time. It already contains a history. But it does not yet contain a finished next life. It is not a tiny tomato neatly folded in half. It needs soil, water, temperature, light, time, and a great many things people usually remember only after something fails to germinate. Possibility still has to meet conditions.

And that is why seeds reveal one simple problem in the way we think:

**we are very good at describing objects and much worse at describing their lives between states.**

We like having “a seed.” Then “a plant.” Then “a harvest.” Meanwhile, everything interesting happens in between.

## What if the passport were alive too?

That is where the idea we currently call **PA(S)ID Seed** came from. Not a passport in the sense of: “tomato, citizenship Italy, passport photo, holder’s signature.” And not a QR code hiding yet another page with the same price on it. The idea is simpler.

**Let the history of the seed continue after the sale.**

Imagine an old household tomato line.

All we know is:

> “Grandma grew it near Poltava. The seeds had been in the family for a long time.”

That is already a history. Not a complete one. But who decided knowledge must be complete before it is allowed to exist?

Later somebody adds:

> in 2004, this tomato was grown near Myrhorod.

Then:

> in 2027, the seeds travelled to Germany.

Then:

> one plant handled a cold summer better than the others.

Then:

> the next generation was saved from that plant.

And the passport grows with the line. You do not have to know everything. You just have to **stop losing what you already know**.

## Unknown is not an error message

This is one of the funniest problems in the digital world.

Life says:

> “I don’t know.”

The form replies:

> **FIELD REQUIRED.**

😹

So the human begins inventing something just to make the red box go away. In a living seed history, the mother may be known and the father unknown. Pollination may have been open. The old name may be known while the exact origin is not. The village may be known but not the coordinates. The year may only be approximate. There may be nothing more than a family story. That is not a defect.

**UNKNOWN is knowledge too.**

It means: the thread disappears here, for now. Maybe someone will find it later.

## A place is not a pin on Google Maps

Imagine two people living twenty metres apart. One garden is open to the south. In the other, a house blocks the Sun after two in the afternoon. On paper, the coordinates are almost identical. In practice, one plant lives in Spain and the other moves to Norway after lunch. All right, slight exaggeration. But plants do not read GPS. They live in actual light. What matters is where the Sun rises, how much of it reaches that exact spot, whether there is a mountain, a tree, a wall, shade, wind, water, and what kind of ground is under the roots. So “plant in a sunny location” can sometimes sound a lot like the medical advice “stay healthy.”

Thank you. Extremely useful. If we are serious about the living history of a plant, then place must mean **environment**, not merely a pin on a map.

## And yes, the Moon

We knew it would arrive sooner or later. It always does.

Usually accompanied by someone saying:

> “My grandmother never planted this on a waning Moon.”

And immediately, someone else appears beside them:

> “Show me a randomized, double-blind, peer-reviewed carrot or your grandmother does not exist.”

Somewhere between those two people is exactly where things become interesting. Human beings have used lunar calendars in agriculture for a very long time. Biodynamic traditions, sowing calendars and systems of lunar days are not museum pieces. People still use them while actually planting, pruning, harvesting and either getting a crop or not getting one. That is an enormous body of human experience. And modern science has a slightly funny habit here. If millions of people have observed something for centuries but failed to package it as CSV and deliver it to the correct journal, the experience becomes oddly translucent.

We propose a different response.

Not:

> “Grandma is automatically right.”

And not:

> “Grandma is automatically stupid because she did not own a laboratory.”

But:

> **let us finally remember properly what Grandma actually did and what happened afterwards.**

Modern biology, incidentally, has begun quietly taking the Moon back out of the basket labelled “nothing to look at here.” Experiments have reported plant responses to full moonlight, including changes in cellular and molecular processes and growth, while a 2026 review in *Plant Science* explicitly describes the subject as controversial but worthy of further research. That does not automatically validate every lunar calendar on Earth.

But it does make this position rather less intellectually comfortable:

> “there is nothing there worth investigating in the first place.”

## Evidence is not born only in a lab coat

This matters to us. If a gardener observes for thirty years that a certain crop does better when sown during a certain period, that is **experience**. If the same recommendation travels through a tradition for centuries, that is **traditional knowledge**. If a system explains it through a metaphysical model, that is **metaphysical knowledge**. If a laboratory records a response of plant cells to moonlight, that is **experimental physical-biological evidence**. None of them has to dress up as another one in order to be seen. We are not proposing that every claim be declared equally true.

We are proposing something both more modest and slightly more insolent:

# do not throw out the witness just because they came from the wrong faculty.

Physics has every right to demand physical evidence when it speaks in the language of physics. That does not make physics the supreme court of historical, traditional, metaphysical or lived experience. And the reverse is also true. A metaphysical explanation should not counterfeit a laboratory report just to sound respectable. Let everyone arrive with their own passport. At least then we know who saw what.

## M{Y}OGA is literally doing what it says on the box

Yoga means joining. Not purée. Not the situation where we put astronomy, plant breeding, Grandma’s notebooks, the Moon, metaphysics, AI and three papers into a blender, press MAX and produce “quantum biodynamic tomato science for the new age.” No, thank you.

M{Y}OGA is interested in something else:

**join without erasing the difference.**

We can know what the Moon was doing, what a particular calendar recommended, what the person actually did, what the temperature was, which variety it was, how much Sun reached the bed, and what happened two weeks later. That is enough. We already have something worth talking about. Perhaps one tradition will turn out to be remarkably accurate for a particular crop. Another may not. Perhaps part of the effect will turn out to be weather. Perhaps light. Perhaps we will notice something for which we do not yet have a good coordinate at all. Or perhaps a beautiful ancient recommendation will lose to an ordinary table. That is life too.

We are not handing out medals before the race. But we are not banning anyone from the track either.

## A failed tomato has a biography too

This is one of our favourite human habits. Successful harvest? Photo. Instagram. “Blessed.” Three hearts, a basket of tomatoes, sunset. Didn’t germinate? Silence. Wilted? Never happened. Slugs ate it? History revised. Eventually the database begins describing a magnificent fictional planet where every plant is healthy, every grower competent, the weather obedient and the slugs compliant with community guidelines. We do not need that planet. If a seed failed to germinate, that is part of the history. If frost killed it, that is part of the history. If the cat dug up the seedlings, that is part of the history.

If your neighbour smoked the plant, that too is, unfortunately, part of the history. And possibly very important for correctly classifying the cause of crop failure.

😹

Because otherwise, ten years later, the system may produce the elegant conclusion:

> “this genetic line has low survival.”

When the truth is:

> “three cases were deer, two were hail, and four were neighbour Sergei.”

Those are rather different causalities.

## Seeds remember people

And this may be the most important part. Behind many old varieties are not institutions. There are people. Families. Villages. Farmers. Gardens. Displacement. Wars. Migrations. A woman who spent twenty years selecting the best fruit and never once used the word “breeding,” despite doing exactly that. A man who carried seeds across a border in his pocket because he did not want to lose his garden.

A child who, forty years later, remembers only:

> “those were Mum’s beans.”

In a modern system, this kind of information is often called “unstructured.” Interesting word. Maybe the story is not what lacks structure. Maybe our structure is simply too small.

## A lot of good work already exists

It is important not to perform the usual technology ritual:

> “Before us, nobody had ever thought about seeds.”

They had. FAO and international genebanks have long maintained passport-data standards for plant genetic resources. MCPD provides an international language for ex situ accessions, while GLIS can give plant material persistent digital identifiers. SeedLog already lets farmers keep a Seed Passport, a seasonal diary, soil and biodiversity information and harvest records, while explicitly stating a principle we strongly agree with: **the farmer owns the data, and sharing happens only with consent**. SeedExchange is already being built around living collections, custodians, accessions, a marketplace and exchange. That is excellent news.

Because real innovation does not always mean:

> “throw the old thing away and put our logo on it.”

Sometimes it means:

> **notice that good pieces already exist in different places, and teach them not to lose one another.**

## Maybe the passport should not be a passport at all

At some point, the idea begins to break its own name.

A passport usually records: who you are.

What matters here is more interesting:

**who you were, what you passed through, and what you became next.**

Maybe what we need is not a document about a seed. Maybe we need a **biography of a living line**. Then a sale is just one event. An exchange another. Planting another. Frost another. Crossing another. Death is an event too. A new generation does not erase the old one. It continues it with difference. And at this point the seed begins, strangely enough, to resemble us. We too like to think of ourselves as stable objects with a name and a photograph. In reality, we are much closer to a history of transitions.

## What is all this for?

Not so that every grandmother has to complete a twenty-seven-page provenance declaration before planting dill. If the system requires a satellite number, a soil spectrum and a genebank password before you are allowed to plant beans, the system should be quietly taken behind the shed and given some time to think about its behaviour. The point is exactly the opposite. You can record very little. Even one sentence. The more we know, the more we can see.

We may notice where a particular line handles cold better. Where flavour changes. Where a disease keeps returning. Which conditions help germination. Whether traditional recommendations repeat. Whether there is a relationship with lunar cycles. What kind of selection was happening outside any laboratory, simply through human hands. And above all, **not lose a history simply because it did not fit the old form**.

## Science could loosen its tie a little too

The Western scientific tradition has given humanity extraordinary things. Medicines. Telescopes. Genetics. Spacecraft. And probably the best method ever invented for making an author explain what exactly they meant. That is an enormous strength. But strength has blind spots too. One of them appears when an instrument quietly begins to assume that everything it does not currently measure is somehow less real. That is no longer scepticism. That is a slightly administrative personality. The world is not required to submit an application in triplicate before it is allowed to happen.

😹

So we propose a very simple form of intellectual courtesy:

**do not confuse “my method has not confirmed this” with “this does not exist.”**

And, in the mirror image:

**do not confuse “I experienced this” with “I have already explained the universal mechanism.”**

Between those two extremes lies an enormous territory. That is where it gets interesting.

## A seed as the memory of the future

Perhaps in ten years one particular tomato line will have a history longer than some human CVs. Poltava. Warsaw. Munich. A hot summer. A cold spring. Open pollination. A good harvest. A failed harvest. Two selections. One cat. Three generations of humans. Seven generations of plants.

And somewhere inside that history there will be one small note:

> “Grandma gave me the seeds. I don’t remember the exact year.”

I would hate for a future system to throw away that exact line because the metadata quality was too low. Because it may be the most important thing in the whole record.

---

# INSTEAD OF A CONCLUSION

A seed is not a packet of data. It is not only a genome. Not only a product. Not only a cultural symbol. Not only a possible plant. It passes through all of these. It moves from hands into soil, from soil into plant, from plant back into seed, from country to country, from generation to generation. And every time, something is preserved. Something changes. Something is lost. Something appears for the first time. We can keep building systems that see only the packet currently in front of them. Or we can try to see the **line**. Not because we know everything about it. But because we have finally stopped treating the unknown as a reason to erase the history.

> **Life is the centre of the graph. The passport is only there so the memory does not get lost along the way.**

And if, a hundred years from now, a plant grows in somebody else’s garden whose history began with a short note saying “seeds from Grandma,” that will be enough. Because sometimes civilization does not begin with a grand archive. Sometimes it begins because someone simply **did not throw away the little packet**.

**© 2026 Ievgen Karogod / Dattara · MET[Ȧ]CADEMY OF HUMANITY (MoH)**